<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>--- coollawblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coollawblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coollawblog.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the attorneys at Coolidge Wall Co., L.P.A.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='coollawblog.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://coollawblog.com/osd.xml" title="--- coollawblog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://coollawblog.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Motions to Dismiss Still A Possibility</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2013/04/05/motions-to-dismiss-still-a-possibility/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2013/04/05/motions-to-dismiss-still-a-possibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashcroft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bell Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iqbal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion to dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacksteder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twombly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ by Mark Kingseed In spite of the recent Second District Appellate Court decision in Sacksteder v. Senny, 2012 Ohio 4452 (2012), which declined to adopt the more stringent pleading standards set out by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2013/04/05/motions-to-dismiss-still-a-possibility/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=261&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2013/04/05/motions-to-dismiss-still-a-possibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/4/000/148/39f/26f38b5.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Mark Kingseed</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Increase the Odds That the Loser &#8220;Really Pays&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2013/01/28/how-to-increase-the-odds-that-the-loser-really-pays/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2013/01/28/how-to-increase-the-odds-that-the-loser-really-pays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fee award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney's fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egregious behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loser pays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  by Richard A. Talda Often, a client seeking our advice asks if they can recover their attorney’s fees in a lawsuit.  We explain that an award of attorney’s fees to a prevailing party only occurs in a few situations:  when &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2013/01/28/how-to-increase-the-odds-that-the-loser-really-pays/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=258&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2013/01/28/how-to-increase-the-odds-that-the-loser-really-pays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/1/000/109/289/2c5fc82.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Richard A. Talda</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Announces 2013 Pension Plan Limitations</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/19/irs-announces-2013-pension-plan-limitations/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/19/irs-announces-2013-pension-plan-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 retirement plan contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of living adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary deferral limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ by Brent Gambill &#160; On October 18, 2012, the IRS announced cost-of-living adjustments for 2013 retirement plan contributions.  Individuals will be able to contribute more to retirement plans in 2013.  Highlights of the IRS announcement include: Increasing the salary deferral limit &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/19/irs-announces-2013-pension-plan-limitations/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=247&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/19/irs-announces-2013-pension-plan-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/5/000/1b5/0c3/07cb838.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Brent Gambill</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Bill 48 Modified Ohio’s LLC Statute. Your company’s rights and obligations may have changed.</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/15/house-bill-48-modified-ohios-llc-statute-your-companys-rights-and-obligations-may-have-changed/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/15/house-bill-48-modified-ohios-llc-statute-your-companys-rights-and-obligations-may-have-changed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio LLC statute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  by W. Chip Herin III Effective May 4, 2012, House Bill 48 significantly restructured Ohio’s LLC statute by codifying Members’ and Managers’ fiduciary duties, delineating the duties a Member-Manager owes depending on how that Member was appointed Manager, and adding &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/15/house-bill-48-modified-ohios-llc-statute-your-companys-rights-and-obligations-may-have-changed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=241&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/15/house-bill-48-modified-ohios-llc-statute-your-companys-rights-and-obligations-may-have-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media03.linkedin.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/4/000/13f/02d/2d7853a.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">W. Chip Herin III</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Deserve a Break Today? Not at this McDonald’s</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/08/do-you-deserve-a-break-today-not-at-this-mcdonalds/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/08/do-you-deserve-a-break-today-not-at-this-mcdonalds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint; salaried employee; corporate officer; Dayton Supply; Montgomery County Board of Revision; Supreme Court; unauthorized practice of law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  by Merle F. Wilberding In McDonald’s Corp v. Union County Board of Revision, 2012 Ohio 3751 (Court of Appeals – 3rd District), McDonald’s Corporation made it clear that Connolly Construction Co. (“Connolly”) did not deserve a break today. In fact, &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/08/do-you-deserve-a-break-today-not-at-this-mcdonalds/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=239&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2012/10/08/do-you-deserve-a-break-today-not-at-this-mcdonalds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.coollaw.com/images/139.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting Against Unfair Competition: Will Your Company’s Non-Compete Agreements Survive a Merger?</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2012/08/24/protecting-against-unfair-competition-will-your-companys-non-compete-agreements-survive-a-merger/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2012/08/24/protecting-against-unfair-competition-will-your-companys-non-compete-agreements-survive-a-merger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acordia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-compete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-competition agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[successors and assigns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ by Marc Fleischauer The Ohio Supreme Court recently decided a case about non-competition agreements and the surprising effect of corporate mergers on their enforceability.  The decision changes Ohio law significantly and gives rise to urgent and specific drafting recommendations for employers. &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2012/08/24/protecting-against-unfair-competition-will-your-companys-non-compete-agreements-survive-a-merger/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=237&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2012/08/24/protecting-against-unfair-competition-will-your-companys-non-compete-agreements-survive-a-merger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media02.linkedin.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/2/000/0ac/36c/0dcee8c.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Marc Fleischauer</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reach out and touch someone&#8230; at your own risk! Police can track cell phone emitted GPS data without a warrant</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2012/08/24/reach-out-and-touch-someone-at-your-own-risk-police-can-track-cell-phone-emitted-gps-data-without-a-warrant/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2012/08/24/reach-out-and-touch-someone-at-your-own-risk-police-can-track-cell-phone-emitted-gps-data-without-a-warrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the Tech Are You?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ by Sasha VanDeGrift For those of you who have followed the Coolidge How the TECH Are You? portion of the blog, you may remember that we blogged earlier this year about an Ohio Appellate Court that held that there is no &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2012/08/24/reach-out-and-touch-someone-at-your-own-risk-police-can-track-cell-phone-emitted-gps-data-without-a-warrant/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=232&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2012/08/24/reach-out-and-touch-someone-at-your-own-risk-police-can-track-cell-phone-emitted-gps-data-without-a-warrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media01.linkedin.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/4/000/148/11d/1c114c5.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Sasha VanDeGrift</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ways to Pass the Check: Cost-shifting during the electronic discovery process</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2012/07/06/ways-to-pass-the-check-cost-shifting-during-the-electronic-discovery-process/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2012/07/06/ways-to-pass-the-check-cost-shifting-during-the-electronic-discovery-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorneys' Eyes Only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery requests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit Model Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper discovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  by Sasha VanDeGrift There is an old saying that there is no such thing as a free lunch. But in the e-discovery arena, there are times when counsel can “pass the check” for e-discovery to the opposing party.  Many courts &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2012/07/06/ways-to-pass-the-check-cost-shifting-during-the-electronic-discovery-process/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=217&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2012/07/06/ways-to-pass-the-check-cost-shifting-during-the-electronic-discovery-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media01.linkedin.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/4/000/148/11d/1c114c5.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Sasha VanDeGrift</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asset Protection: Sometimes, being attached to your spouse means that your creditors cannot attach your assets</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2012/07/03/asset-protection-sometimes-being-attached-to-your-spouse-means-that-your-creditors-cannot-attach-your-assets/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2012/07/03/asset-protection-sometimes-being-attached-to-your-spouse-means-that-your-creditors-cannot-attach-your-assets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[husband and wife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenancy By The Entirety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  by Patricia Friesinger HISTORY LESSON: Back in days of yore, (2/9/72 &#8211; 4/4/85 in Ohio), a form of property ownership known as Tenancy By the Entirety (TBE) was recognized.  The TBE form of property ownership harkens back to times &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2012/07/03/asset-protection-sometimes-being-attached-to-your-spouse-means-that-your-creditors-cannot-attach-your-assets/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=208&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2012/07/03/asset-protection-sometimes-being-attached-to-your-spouse-means-that-your-creditors-cannot-attach-your-assets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media01.linkedin.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/2/000/0fb/114/3900901.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Patricia  Friesinger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s a Tax, not a Regulation of Commerce!</title>
		<link>http://coollawblog.com/2012/06/28/its-a-tax-not-a-regulation-of-commerce/</link>
		<comments>http://coollawblog.com/2012/06/28/its-a-tax-not-a-regulation-of-commerce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coollawblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Last Word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power to tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coollawblog.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  by Mike Leesman   Prior to today, the case brought by twenty-six states (including Ohio), several individuals, and the National Federation of Independent Business challenging the constitutionality of the individual mandate portion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care &#8230; <a href="http://coollawblog.com/2012/06/28/its-a-tax-not-a-regulation-of-commerce/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=coollawblog.com&#038;blog=31096831&#038;post=205&#038;subd=coollawblog&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coollawblog.com/2012/06/28/its-a-tax-not-a-regulation-of-commerce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4cd400cb817e81e5615075bae6038c61?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">coollawblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media01.linkedin.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/3/000/009/162/3b2e439.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Mike Leesman</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
